Talk:Fighter


 * I removed the minibosses from the table of Fighter thralls since they cannot be captured, but I see other Fighters that cannot be captured on there too. Is this table meant to have all NPCs labeled [Fighter] regardless of whether they can be taken as thralls or not? If so, some sort of distinction between them should be made as the article lede implies all of them can be taken, which certainly is not the case. In my opinion, this table is only useful for listing Fighters that are valid thrall targets, and including other Fighter NPCs only adds unnecessary confusion.Nmenth (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have already noticed that back in the days and therefore I inserted the last minibosses there to keep in line. Even pure NPCs like Razma the Shem, Vathis the Hierophant and a lot more are added to these lists, mostly of course with the fighters. But the idea to list them all separately to prevent confusion is a good idea and i totally agree with that. Even thralls who can still be captured will not be farmable anymore in some further patches and then we can move them accordingly. But I wouldn't just delete the NPC entrys, because the names, IDs and stats could still be interesting for admins and modders who wanna spawn them. SirBowen (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should add a second table in a separate section with non-capturable Fighter NPCs then.Nmenth (talk) 21:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)